Fraud Blocker

Article 120, UCMJ


Article 120, UCMJ: Sexual Assault and Related Offenses in the Military

Understanding the Military’s Sexual Assault Laws

Allegations of sexual misconduct under the Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) can have profound and far-reaching consequences for service members. Whether you’re facing accusations or simply seeking to understand your legal obligations, having a comprehensive understanding of Article 120 is essential for all military personnel. This article provides an overview of Article 120, its evolution over time, and what service members should know about these serious offenses.

What Is Article 120?

Article 120 of the UCMJ addresses sexual crimes in the military, including rape, sexual assault, and other forms of sexual misconduct. The article defines these offenses and establishes the punitive measures for those found guilty. Penalties under Article 120 are severe, reflecting the military’s commitment to maintaining good order and discipline while protecting the welfare of all service members. Consequences can range from reduction in rank and forfeiture of pay to dishonorable discharge and lengthy prison sentences—sometimes extending to life imprisonment for the most serious violations.

The Evolution of Article 120: Congressional Oversight Since 2007

Article 120 has undergone significant revisions since 2007, demonstrating consistent congressional attention to military sexual assault. Prior to 2007, the UCMJ’s sexual offense provisions had remained largely unchanged since their initial adoption in 1950. However, growing concerns about sexual assault rates in the military and questions about the effectiveness of the military justice system prompted Congress to take action.

The 2007 amendments represented the first major overhaul, significantly restructuring Article 120 to create more specific offenses and modernize outdated language. Rather than a single offense of “rape,” the article was expanded to include multiple offenses with varying elements and penalties.

In 2012, Congress again revised Article 120, further refining definitions and addressing concerns raised by military courts about certain provisions. These changes clarified the consent standard and reorganized the offenses into more logical categories. The Military Justice Act of 2016, which took effect in 2019, continued this trend of refinement with additional modifications to definitions and elements of the offenses.

These consistent revisions reflect Congress’s ongoing commitment to addressing sexual assault in the military. Unlike many other areas of military law, which may see infrequent updates, Article 120 has been subject to regular review and amendment. This heightened congressional interest stems from both public concern about military sexual assault cases and the unique challenges of prosecuting such cases within the military justice system.

Current Structure: Categories of Offenses Under Article 120

Today’s Article 120 is organized into four major categories of sexual offenses, each with specific elements that must be proven for a conviction:

  1. Rape Rape charges involve sexual acts done by unlawful force, against the victim’s will, or when the victim cannot consent due to impairment, unconsciousness, or age. The offense is further categorized based on whether penetration occurred, with penetrative offenses carrying more severe penalties. Rape convictions can result in dishonorable discharge, forfeiture of all pay and allowances, and confinement for life without the possibility of parole.
  2. Sexual Assault Sexual assault encompasses a broader range of unwanted sexual acts that occur without consent but may not involve the level of force or coercion required for rape charges. These offenses include situations where consent was obtained by fraud, where the accused abused a position of authority, or where the victim was incapable of consenting due to impairment. Like rape, sexual assault charges are categorized based on whether penetration occurred. Convictions typically result in dishonorable discharge and confinement for up to 30 years.
  3. Aggravated Sexual Contact This category involves touching (but not penetrating) the genitalia, anus, groin, breast, inner thigh, or buttocks of another person with an intent to abuse, humiliate, harass, or degrade, or to arouse or gratify sexual desire. The “aggravated” designation applies when the contact occurs under the same circumstances that would constitute rape if the act had been a sexual act. Penalties include dishonorable discharge and confinement for up to 20 years.
  4. Abusive Sexual Contact Similar to aggravated sexual contact, this offense involves inappropriate touching but under circumstances that would constitute sexual assault (rather than rape) if the act had been a sexual act. This category covers a wide range of misconduct with various potential penalties, typically including dishonorable discharge and confinement for up to 7 years.

Evidentiary Challenges in Article 120 Cases

Article 120 cases present unique evidentiary challenges. Many incidents occur in private settings without witnesses, creating a situation where cases often hinge on credibility assessments rather than objective evidence. This “he said, she said” dynamic requires careful evaluation of all available evidence.

Physical evidence, when available, must be meticulously examined. DNA evidence, while potentially powerful, doesn’t necessarily establish lack of consent—often the central issue in these cases. Digital evidence such as text messages, emails, and social media communications may provide important context about the relationship between the parties and events surrounding the alleged incident.

Witness testimony becomes particularly crucial in these cases. Character witnesses who can speak to the accused’s reputation and behavior patterns may influence how fact-finders interpret ambiguous situations. Witnesses who observed the parties before or after the alleged incident might provide insights into the mental state and behavior of both the accused and the accuser.

If You’ve Been Accused: Immediate Steps to Take

If you are a servicemember who has been accused of an Article 120 offense, the actions you take in the immediate aftermath can significantly impact the outcome of your case. The following steps are critical to protect your rights and future:

Exercise Your Right to Remain Silent

The most important immediate step is to exercise your right to remain silent. Under Article 31(b) of the UCMJ, you have the right not to make any statement regarding the offense of which you are accused or suspected. When investigators approach you, they are required to inform you of this right, but you should be proactive in asserting it.

Do not discuss the allegations with anyone except your attorney—not your commander, not your first sergeant, not your friends, and especially not on social media. Even seemingly innocent statements can be taken out of context or misinterpreted. Remember that military investigators are trained to elicit information, and casual conversations can quickly turn into evidence against you.

Seek Experienced Legal Representation Immediately

While the military will assign you a JAG defense counsel, you have the right to retain civilian counsel experienced in military law. This decision is one of the most consequential you can make. Military defense attorneys are dedicated professionals, but they often carry heavy caseloads and may have limited experience with complex Article 120 cases.

An experienced civilian military defense attorney brings several advantages:

  • Specialized Experience: Civilian attorneys who focus on military defense often have extensive experience specifically with Article 120 cases and understand the nuances of these prosecutions.
  • Dedicated Resources: Civilian counsel can typically dedicate more time and resources to your case than military defense counsel who may be juggling numerous cases simultaneously.
  • Strategic Independence: Civilian attorneys operate outside the military chain of command and can pursue aggressive defense strategies without concerns about career implications.
  • Complementary Representation: Civilian counsel can work alongside your assigned military counsel, giving you the benefit of both perspectives and skill sets.

When selecting civilian counsel, look for attorneys with specific experience defending Article 120 cases in military courts. This is a specialized area of law that requires deep understanding of both the UCMJ and the unique culture of military justice.

Preserve Evidence

While following your attorney’s guidance, take steps to preserve potentially exculpatory evidence. This may include:

  • Saving all communications with the accuser (text messages, emails, social media exchanges)
  • Creating a timeline of events surrounding the alleged incident
  • Identifying potential witnesses who may have relevant information
  • Documenting your whereabouts and activities during the relevant timeframe

Do not attempt to contact the accuser or potential witnesses directly, as this could be interpreted as witness tampering or obstruction. Instead, provide this information to your attorney who can pursue it through proper channels.

How an Experienced Military Defense Attorney Supports Your Case

A skilled civilian military defense attorney provides far more than just courtroom representation. They serve as your guide, advocate, and strategist throughout the entire process:

Comprehensive Case Analysis

An experienced attorney will conduct a thorough review of all evidence, identifying weaknesses in the prosecution’s case and developing strategies to exploit those weaknesses. This includes scrutinizing forensic evidence, witness statements, and investigative procedures for inconsistencies or violations of your rights.

Strategic Investigation

While military investigators focus on gathering evidence to support the prosecution, your defense attorney conducts independent investigation aimed at uncovering exculpatory evidence. This may involve:

  • Interviewing witnesses the military may have overlooked
  • Consulting with forensic experts to challenge prosecution evidence
  • Examining digital evidence for context that supports your account
  • Investigating the accuser’s background for relevant information (while respecting legal and ethical boundaries)

Procedural Advocacy

Military justice involves complex procedures that can significantly impact your case. Your attorney will file appropriate motions to:

  • Suppress evidence obtained in violation of your rights
  • Limit the introduction of prejudicial information
  • Secure access to evidence helpful to your defense
  • Challenge the qualifications of prosecution experts
  • Address potential unlawful command influence

Expert Coordination

Article 120 cases often benefit from expert testimony in areas such as forensic analysis, toxicology, memory psychology, or digital forensics. An experienced defense attorney maintains relationships with qualified experts who can evaluate evidence and potentially testify on your behalf.

Negotiation Skills

Not all cases go to court-martial. Your attorney can engage with the prosecution to explore potential resolutions that minimize consequences. This might include:

  • Advocating for administrative rather than criminal disposition
  • Negotiating reduced charges
  • Securing favorable pretrial agreements

Court-Martial Representation

If your case proceeds to court-martial, your attorney will provide comprehensive representation, including:

  • Jury selection strategy (if a panel trial)
  • Opening and closing arguments
  • Cross-examination of prosecution witnesses
  • Presentation of defense witnesses and evidence
  • Protection of your rights throughout the proceedings

Post-Trial Advocacy

The military justice process doesn’t necessarily end with the verdict. If necessary, your attorney can pursue post-trial relief through:

  • Clemency requests
  • Appeals to the service Courts of Criminal Appeals
  • Appeals to the Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces
  • In appropriate cases, federal court review

Understanding the Stakes

An Article 120 conviction carries consequences that extend far beyond military punishment. A dishonorable discharge or dismissal creates a permanent criminal record that can affect:

  • Future employment opportunities
  • Professional licensing
  • Housing applications
  • Educational opportunities
  • Voting rights in some states
  • Firearm ownership
  • International travel

Additionally, most Article 120 convictions require sex offender registration, which imposes significant restrictions on where you can live and work for decades or even life. The social stigma alone can have devastating effects on family relationships and community standing.

Given these profound consequences, investing in experienced legal representation is not merely advisable—it’s essential. The decisions you make in the early stages of an investigation can significantly impact the final outcome of your case and potentially the rest of your life.

Defense Considerations in Article 120 Cases

Defense strategies must be tailored to the specific circumstances of each case. Common approaches include:

Consent Defense: In many cases, the accused may acknowledge that a sexual encounter occurred but maintain that it was consensual. Establishing evidence of consent through communications, witness observations of interactions between the parties, or other contextual factors becomes crucial.

Credibility Challenges: Defense counsel may need to respectfully examine inconsistencies in the accuser’s account or explore potential motives that might influence testimony. This must be done carefully and professionally to avoid alienating military judges or panel members.

Forensic Analysis: Expert examination of physical and digital evidence may reveal alternative interpretations or challenge the prosecution’s narrative. Technical expertise in areas like DNA analysis, digital forensics, or toxicology may be necessary.

Procedural Violations: Military investigations must follow strict protocols. Violations of the accused’s rights during the investigation process, improper evidence handling, or failure to follow proper procedures may provide grounds for challenging evidence or even dismissing charges.

What Service Members Should Know

Understanding the nuances of Article 120 is essential for all military personnel. Sexual assault prevention training is mandatory throughout the services, but developing a deeper knowledge of the legal definitions and boundaries is equally important.

Service members should be aware that alcohol often plays a significant role in Article 120 cases. Impairment can affect one’s ability to consent, and military courts have consistently held that voluntary intoxication is not a defense for the accused. Clear communication and obtaining affirmative consent are essential practices to avoid misconduct allegations.

If accused of an Article 120 violation, immediate legal consultation is critical. The military will provide defense counsel, but service members have the right to seek civilian legal representation with experience in military law. Statements made to commanders, investigators, or others can significantly impact a case, so understanding your rights before speaking is essential.

Looking Forward: Continued Evolution of Military Sexual Assault Law

Congressional oversight of Article 120 shows no signs of diminishing. Military leaders continue to face pressure to address sexual assault within the ranks, and legislative attention remains focused on ensuring the military justice system effectively addresses these cases.

Potential future reforms may include further adjustments to reporting procedures, investigative practices, and trial processes. The ongoing dialogue between military justice practitioners, victim advocates, and lawmakers ensures that Article 120 will continue to evolve in response to lessons learned and changing societal standards.

Service members should stay informed about these developments and maintain a commitment to creating a culture of respect and consent within their units. Understanding both the letter and the spirit of Article 120 is essential not only for legal compliance but also for fostering a military environment where all personnel can serve with dignity and respect.

Contact Kral Military Defense Today

If you or someone you love is facing allegations under Article 120 of the UCMJ, it is critical to act quickly. These cases move fast in the military justice system, and early intervention can make all the difference.

Contact Kral Military Defense today to schedule a consultation and begin building a robust defense. We’re here to protect your rights, your reputation, and your future.

 

Kral Military Defense

Military Defense Attorneys

855-707-UCMJ

Our Team


Let's Talk

Please complete the form below and we will reach out to set up a time to discuss your case.

*Please note, KMD does not handle cases involving the Department of Veterans Affairs, disability claims, or family law matters.

By submitting, you agree to receive text messages at the provided number from Kral Military Defense. Message frequency varies, and standard message and data rates may apply. You have the right to OPT-OUT receiving messages at any time. To OPT-OUT, reply "STOP" to any text message you receive from us. Reply HELP for assistance. See Privacy Policy details.

Kral Military Defense
Excellent
4.9
100% professional and timely. Abbigayle and Danielle walked me through every step. They were monsters, coming in swinging and more blood thirsty than a 1986 Mike Tyson. If you want someone in your corner that goes in with “naval guns”, then these are your gals.
Worth.Every.Dollar.
Wow! Danielle from this Firm has been nothing short of AMAZING! She helped me get to the bottom of my issue with one of my legal forms in the Military, and gave me more Hope to my specific case! She was relentless and offered her help in every way. She was prompt on our call, diligent and very responsive. I really appreciate everything and I'm excited for the future! Thank you Kral Military Defense for your help along this journey! I'm glad I was recommended to you!!!
I am a criminal defense attorney in Northern California; I have had multiple clients with potential military issues with their criminal case. I researched military law attorneys and found she came highly reviewed. These military law questions require particular expertise to see how they can affect my clients, and Stephanie Kral always responded timely with great advice to help my clients. Whenever I have a military question, I contact Stephanie Kral.
Stephanie and the Kral Military Defense firm did an excellent job fighting my NILD (not in the line of duty) determination. They are extremely knowledgeable and professional. The rebuttal that they wrote convinced the appointing authority to reverse their decision and I am not on track to receive the benefits that I earned. I highly recommend this firm for any military related matters.
Stephanie was very kind and always gave great advice. She responded to all my questions in a timely manner. 10/10 recommend.
If you are reading this more than likely you are in desperation mode and looking for a military defense lawyer. STOP looking, you found steph and her team. From the go i was taken care of, every question answered and every worry put at ease. The way steph strategized and wrote my defense i could not have done myself nor i think any jag would have done it. I remember sitting across from her very worried and nervous, she asked what was i worried about and i named off a couple corncerns, she went on to explain them all and why i should not worry because she had it handled. There is no price for that feeling. Her and her teams many years of experience is what you need. Thank you steph. I can now move on and reach that finish line.
Good morning, Afternoon or Evening to all.
I recently had Stephanie, Lindsey and Danielle as my defense counsel team. They were very professional, approachable and available to assist, give information and be readily available. Nothing but a wonderful experience, definitely help me keep my stress levels at bay while dealing with the legal process regarding my case. I am keep their contact information on hand for anyone who will ever need there services. Highly recommended.
I found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was in desperate need for a military defense attorney. Steph, Abbey and Danielle are a POWERHOUSE together. They’re so knowledgeable and professional. I just remember being told that I was getting an automatic ADSEP and all I can say is that I’m still here with an amazing outcome. I highly recommend if you want to save your military career, especially if you find yourself feeling hopeless about your legal situation 100% retain this law firm you won’t regret it. I am beyond grateful to have had KMD on my side.
Thank you so much again for a fantastic job!:) Teiona B
I found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was desperate for an attorney. I am so glad that I found KMD. Steph is a POWERHOUSE and didn't back down during the entire case. She is so knowledgeable and uses her knowledge to your advantage. I could not recommend her more, especially if you find yourself feeling hopeless about a legal case. I am beyond grateful to have met Steph and have her on my side.
Found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was in need of a lawyer. Luckily when I did a google search Kral Military Defense was the first website to pop up. If you are willing to fight for your name and career, then look no further Kral Military Defense is who you want on your side. Stephaine and her team are very knowledgeable and professional.
Kral Military Defenses has my highest recommendation! If you are a service member and need an attorney who is responsive, intelligent, and treats you like a person, not just a number. She is the attorney for you.

I was on deployment when I needed an attorney. Kral Military Defense took care of my legal affairs while I was out to sea. It was a weight off my shoulders knowing she was handling my situation back home while I was gone.

When my chain of command was putting unnecessary limitations on my liberty because of my legal situation. She went above and beyond by contacted my ship and was able to get them lifted.

Kral Military Defense was able to resolve my situation with no action taken against myself. If I ever need of a defense attorney ever again I'm 100% coming back to Kral Military Defense.
My local Military Defense Counsel is very short staffed so I had trouble getting a hold of them. Not wanting to wait I contacted Ms. Danielle Espinosa over the weekend and she was able to help review and discuss my response with me before it was due Monday. She was extremely knowledgeable, cut the fluff and told me like it was. I recommend anyone serious about the future of their Military Career to work with this team. Thank you for your help!
When I retained Ms. Kral, I was a nervous wreck. As she worked with me over the course of 18 months, she was compassionate and was able to assure me that I would have a future. Even my command JAG assured me I’d be alright when I hired her. I couldn’t have asked for a better outcome with my case. Ms. Kral should be your choice if you need a military defense attorney.
Abbigayle Hunter and her legal team, especially Danielle Espinosa, were exceptional! The communication was prompt, professional, and thorough. From the moment we reached out to them, they showed a genuine interest in understanding our case and providing us with the best legal representation possible.

Abbigayle Hunter and Danielle Espinosa, went above and beyond to ensure that we were kept informed throughout the entire legal process. They promptly responded to our emails and phone calls, addressing any concerns or questions we had. Their attention to detail and extensive knowledge of the law instilled confidence in us that we were in capable hands.

Not only did Abbigayle Hunter and her team provide us with excellent communication, but they also displayed a remarkable level of expertise. They meticulously examined every aspect of our case, leaving no stone unturned. Their dedication and commitment to our case were evident in the meticulous research they conducted, the thorough documentation they prepared, and the persuasive arguments they presented.

Abbigayle Hunter not only possessed an impressive understanding of the law but also had excellent negotiation skills. Her tirelessly advocated on our behalf, ensuring that our interests were protected and our rights were upheld. Their ability to navigate complex legal matters and maneuver through any obstacles that arose was truly remarkable.
Stephanie and her team were AMAZING! I found her through a mutual friend and she handled my case with care and compassion. Even her team checked on me, answered all my questions I had, overall she made sure everything was token care of during the ENTIRE process! When she told me “don’t you worry, that’s my job” I truly believe her and in the end she got the results that I am so grateful for! Hopefully I won’t have to go through the process again but if I have to she will most definitely be the woman I WILL call on! Thank you so much Stephanie and Danielle you both made this process a lot less stressful with your knowledge and compassion towards me and my case!!!
Steph and her team worked diligently to ensure all evidence or lack there of was thoroughly examined. Her knowledge and experience within the military justice system gave me piece of mind throughout the process as she was well versed in the way everything played out. My family and I are grateful for the hard work and professionalism displayed by everyone on her team. Thank you!
Steph was the first and clear choice to handle my ADSEP board. I was facing serious allegations, which she handled with professionalism while keeping me posted along the way. Her expertise in UCMJ matters is second to none. Without her I would have probably lost my retirement benefits.
Stephanie is very experienced and a great attorney.
There are many things that I could say about this particular law firm, but instead of going into the weeds on my particular case, I feel as though brevity would be the best choice here. I was primarily represented by Ms. Abbigayle Hunter, and in short, I believe the representation by Ms. Hunter was above reproach. I couldn’t have asked for a better legal professional to handle the complexities of my particular case. She was transparent, punctual, and actually made me feel as though she was personally invested, despite the fact that she had already been paid for representation. She didn’t sugarcoat hard truths and was very up front about all different aspects relating to my case. It was comforting in a way that she was also a fellow service member, and it made me feel as though she took this case to heart and it added another level of drive to the case. Ms. Hunter has a certain tenacity in the courtroom that I found very refreshing to witness, and I would strongly recommend her to anyone else seeking legal advice. Would actively seek to be represented by her again, though also hoping it’s never needed.
Outstanding!!!! She's very smart, knows her job, and communicates with you all the time with the best of her knowledge. I highly recommend Kral Military Defense!!!
After my command refused to give me due process, I was lost for words and truly had no where to turn. A shipmate referred me to Steph and it was the best possible recommendation I have ever received. Reliable, expert, professional and overall just a great person. She never lost sight of my case and would check in on me to ensure I was doing good personally. I highly recommend her services to anyone who may have a legal issue. At minimum, request a consultation. I can assure that you will not be dissatisfied!
Great team! After hiring this legal team i was pleased with their work and their ability to go above and beyond resulting in a finding of not guilty.
js_loader

About The Firm


Kral Military Defense defends members of America's military throughout the world. We do not maintain physical office space in the traditional sense. Instead, we offer secure video and telephone consultations and meet with current clients, as needed, at home and abroad.

KMD practices in Washington D.C. under D.C. App. R. 49, limiting the practice only to federal military courts in which we are admitted to practice providing services authorized under Rule 49(c)(3). No attorney is admitted to the Washington D.C. Bar, which is not required for our federal military practice.

Office Location


3111 Camino Del Rio N.
Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92108

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Nothing on this site should create an expectation of any particular outcome or result. Every case is unique.

Back to Top

©2025 Kral Military Defense | Sitemap

855-707-UCMJ