Fraud Blocker

Article 138, UCMJ


Article 138, UCMJ: A Servicemember’s Guide to Redress of Grievances

The Uniform Code of Military Justice (UCMJ) provides servicemembers with various avenues to seek redress when they believe they have been wronged by their commanding officers. Article 138 stands as one of the most powerful tools available to military personnel who feel they have been treated unjustly. This article explores the purpose, procedures, and practical applications of Article 138 across the different military branches.

What is Article 138?

Article 138 of the UCMJ states that any servicemember who believes they have been wronged by their commanding officer may request redress. If such redress is refused, the servicemember may file a formal complaint that will be forwarded up the chain of command, ultimately reaching the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction (GCMCA).

The purpose of Article 138 is to provide servicemembers with a formal mechanism to address grievances that cannot be resolved through normal channels. It ensures that those in positions of authority are held accountable for their actions and decisions.

Valid Grounds for Article 138 Complaints

Not all grievances qualify for an Article 138 complaint. Valid grounds typically include:

  1. Denial of leave when properly requested and justified
  2. Improper punishment outside the UCMJ framework
  3. Discriminatory treatment based on race, religion, gender, or other protected categories
  4. Withholding of entitlements or benefits without proper justification
  5. Improper denial of promotion when all requirements have been met
  6. Arbitrary or capricious decisions that negatively impact a servicemember’s career

Examples of Valid Article 138 Complaints

Example 1: Denial of Leave

A soldier submits a leave request with appropriate justification during a non-critical period. The commander denies the request without explanation despite the unit having sufficient personnel to maintain operations. After attempting to resolve the issue informally, the soldier could file an Article 138 complaint.

Example 2: Improper Punishment

A Marine’s commanding officer orders them to perform additional duties as punishment for minor infractions without following proper non-judicial punishment procedures under Article 15. This circumvention of established disciplinary procedures could form the basis of an Article 138 complaint.

Example 3: Discriminatory Treatment

An Air Force officer consistently assigns a female airman to administrative duties while male airmen with similar qualifications are given operational assignments that enhance career advancement. Despite bringing this to the commander’s attention, the pattern continues, potentially warranting an Article 138 complaint.

Service-Specific Procedures

While the fundamental process remains consistent across branches, each service has implemented specific procedures for handling Article 138 complaints.

Army Procedures

Army Regulation 27-10, Chapter 20, outlines the Army’s procedures for Article 138 complaints:

  1. The soldier must first seek redress directly from their commanding officer in writing.
  2. If the commanding officer denies redress within 15 days (or fails to respond), the soldier may file a formal complaint.
  3. The complaint must be submitted within 90 days of the alleged wrong.
  4. The complaint is forwarded through the chain of command to the officer exercising general court-martial jurisdiction.
  5. The GCMCA must investigate the complaint and take appropriate action within 60 days.
  6. A copy of the final action is forwarded to the Department of the Army.

Air Force Procedures

Air Force Instruction 51-904 governs Article 138 complaints for Airmen:

  1. The Airman must first request redress from their commander in writing.
  2. If redress is denied or not provided within 30 days, the Airman may file a formal complaint.
  3. The complaint must be submitted within 90 days of the alleged wrong or denial of redress.
  4. The complaint is forwarded through the chain of command to the GCMCA.
  5. The Staff Judge Advocate (SJA) typically conducts the inquiry and prepares recommendations.
  6. The GCMCA makes the final decision and notifies the Airman of the outcome.
  7. Records of the complaint are maintained by the SJA and forwarded to the Secretary of the Air Force.

Marine Corps Procedures

Marine Corps Order 1700.9 outlines the procedures for Marines:

  1. The Marine must first request redress from their commanding officer in writing.
  2. If redress is denied or not provided within 5 working days, the Marine may file a formal complaint.
  3. The complaint must be submitted within 90 days of the alleged wrong.
  4. The complaint is forwarded via the chain of command to the GCMCA.
  5. The GCMCA must investigate and take appropriate action, typically within 30 days.
  6. The final action is reported to the Secretary of the Navy.

Navy Procedures: Article 138 vs. 1150 Complaints

The Navy has two distinct processes that are often confused: the Article 1150 complaint (Navy Regulation) and the Article 138 complaint (UCMJ).

Article 1150 Complaint

Article 1150 of Navy Regulations allows sailors to file complaints against any superior (not just commanding officers) for:

  1. Violations of law, regulation, or custom of service
  2. Treatment considered oppressive, abusive, or improper
  3. Behavior unbecoming an officer

The process for an 1150 complaint:

  1. The complaint is submitted in writing to the superior’s commanding officer.
  2. The commanding officer investigates and decides on appropriate action.
  3. If the sailor is not satisfied, they can appeal to higher authority.

Navy Article 138 Complaint

The Article 138 process in the Navy, as outlined in JAGMAN (Judge Advocate General Manual) section 0302:

  1. The sailor must first request redress directly from their commanding officer in writing.
  2. If redress is denied or not provided within 15 days, the sailor may file a formal complaint.
  3. The complaint must be submitted within 90 days of the alleged wrong.
  4. The complaint is forwarded through the chain of command to the GCMCA.
  5. The GCMCA must investigate and take appropriate action within 60 days.
  6. The final decision is reported to the Secretary of the Navy.

Key Differences:

  • Article 1150 complaints can be filed against any superior, while Article 138 complaints are specifically against commanding officers.
  • Article 1150 complaints stay within the immediate command structure, while Article 138 complaints go to the GCMCA level.
  • Article 138 complaints have more formal requirements and timelines.

Practical Considerations for Servicemembers

Before filing an Article 138 complaint, servicemembers should:

  1. Attempt informal resolution: Utilize the chain of command and other available resources like the Inspector General’s office.
  2. Document everything: Keep copies of all correspondence, requests, and responses.
  3. Be specific: Clearly identify the wrong committed and the redress sought.
  4. Consult with legal counsel: Military legal assistance attorneys can provide guidance on the process.
  5. Follow timelines: Be aware of the specific deadlines for your branch of service.
  6. Maintain professionalism: Even when filing a complaint, maintain military bearing and professionalism.

Conclusion

Article 138 provides servicemembers with a powerful tool to address grievances when other avenues have been exhausted. While the process can be intimidating, it serves an important purpose in maintaining good order and discipline by ensuring commanders act within the bounds of their authority.

Understanding the proper procedures and requirements for your specific branch of service is crucial to successfully navigating the Article 138 complaint process. When used appropriately, Article 138 helps maintain the balance between command authority and servicemember rights, strengthening the overall military justice system.

Contact us now for a case assessment.

Kral Military Defense

Military Defense Attorneys

855-707-UCMJ

Our Team


Let's Talk

Please complete the form below and we will reach out to set up a time to discuss your case.

*Please note, KMD does not handle cases involving the Department of Veterans Affairs, disability claims, or family law matters.

By submitting, you agree to receive text messages at the provided number from Kral Military Defense. Message frequency varies, and standard message and data rates may apply. You have the right to OPT-OUT receiving messages at any time. To OPT-OUT, reply "STOP" to any text message you receive from us. Reply HELP for assistance. See Privacy Policy details.

Kral Military Defense
Excellent
4.9
100% professional and timely. Abbigayle and Danielle walked me through every step. They were monsters, coming in swinging and more blood thirsty than a 1986 Mike Tyson. If you want someone in your corner that goes in with “naval guns”, then these are your gals.
Worth.Every.Dollar.
Wow! Danielle from this Firm has been nothing short of AMAZING! She helped me get to the bottom of my issue with one of my legal forms in the Military, and gave me more Hope to my specific case! She was relentless and offered her help in every way. She was prompt on our call, diligent and very responsive. I really appreciate everything and I'm excited for the future! Thank you Kral Military Defense for your help along this journey! I'm glad I was recommended to you!!!
I am a criminal defense attorney in Northern California; I have had multiple clients with potential military issues with their criminal case. I researched military law attorneys and found she came highly reviewed. These military law questions require particular expertise to see how they can affect my clients, and Stephanie Kral always responded timely with great advice to help my clients. Whenever I have a military question, I contact Stephanie Kral.
Stephanie and the Kral Military Defense firm did an excellent job fighting my NILD (not in the line of duty) determination. They are extremely knowledgeable and professional. The rebuttal that they wrote convinced the appointing authority to reverse their decision and I am not on track to receive the benefits that I earned. I highly recommend this firm for any military related matters.
Stephanie was very kind and always gave great advice. She responded to all my questions in a timely manner. 10/10 recommend.
If you are reading this more than likely you are in desperation mode and looking for a military defense lawyer. STOP looking, you found steph and her team. From the go i was taken care of, every question answered and every worry put at ease. The way steph strategized and wrote my defense i could not have done myself nor i think any jag would have done it. I remember sitting across from her very worried and nervous, she asked what was i worried about and i named off a couple corncerns, she went on to explain them all and why i should not worry because she had it handled. There is no price for that feeling. Her and her teams many years of experience is what you need. Thank you steph. I can now move on and reach that finish line.
Good morning, Afternoon or Evening to all.
I recently had Stephanie, Lindsey and Danielle as my defense counsel team. They were very professional, approachable and available to assist, give information and be readily available. Nothing but a wonderful experience, definitely help me keep my stress levels at bay while dealing with the legal process regarding my case. I am keep their contact information on hand for anyone who will ever need there services. Highly recommended.
I found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was in desperate need for a military defense attorney. Steph, Abbey and Danielle are a POWERHOUSE together. They’re so knowledgeable and professional. I just remember being told that I was getting an automatic ADSEP and all I can say is that I’m still here with an amazing outcome. I highly recommend if you want to save your military career, especially if you find yourself feeling hopeless about your legal situation 100% retain this law firm you won’t regret it. I am beyond grateful to have had KMD on my side.
Thank you so much again for a fantastic job!:) Teiona B
I found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was desperate for an attorney. I am so glad that I found KMD. Steph is a POWERHOUSE and didn't back down during the entire case. She is so knowledgeable and uses her knowledge to your advantage. I could not recommend her more, especially if you find yourself feeling hopeless about a legal case. I am beyond grateful to have met Steph and have her on my side.
Found myself in an unfortunate situation where I was in need of a lawyer. Luckily when I did a google search Kral Military Defense was the first website to pop up. If you are willing to fight for your name and career, then look no further Kral Military Defense is who you want on your side. Stephaine and her team are very knowledgeable and professional.
Kral Military Defenses has my highest recommendation! If you are a service member and need an attorney who is responsive, intelligent, and treats you like a person, not just a number. She is the attorney for you.

I was on deployment when I needed an attorney. Kral Military Defense took care of my legal affairs while I was out to sea. It was a weight off my shoulders knowing she was handling my situation back home while I was gone.

When my chain of command was putting unnecessary limitations on my liberty because of my legal situation. She went above and beyond by contacted my ship and was able to get them lifted.

Kral Military Defense was able to resolve my situation with no action taken against myself. If I ever need of a defense attorney ever again I'm 100% coming back to Kral Military Defense.
My local Military Defense Counsel is very short staffed so I had trouble getting a hold of them. Not wanting to wait I contacted Ms. Danielle Espinosa over the weekend and she was able to help review and discuss my response with me before it was due Monday. She was extremely knowledgeable, cut the fluff and told me like it was. I recommend anyone serious about the future of their Military Career to work with this team. Thank you for your help!
When I retained Ms. Kral, I was a nervous wreck. As she worked with me over the course of 18 months, she was compassionate and was able to assure me that I would have a future. Even my command JAG assured me I’d be alright when I hired her. I couldn’t have asked for a better outcome with my case. Ms. Kral should be your choice if you need a military defense attorney.
Abbigayle Hunter and her legal team, especially Danielle Espinosa, were exceptional! The communication was prompt, professional, and thorough. From the moment we reached out to them, they showed a genuine interest in understanding our case and providing us with the best legal representation possible.

Abbigayle Hunter and Danielle Espinosa, went above and beyond to ensure that we were kept informed throughout the entire legal process. They promptly responded to our emails and phone calls, addressing any concerns or questions we had. Their attention to detail and extensive knowledge of the law instilled confidence in us that we were in capable hands.

Not only did Abbigayle Hunter and her team provide us with excellent communication, but they also displayed a remarkable level of expertise. They meticulously examined every aspect of our case, leaving no stone unturned. Their dedication and commitment to our case were evident in the meticulous research they conducted, the thorough documentation they prepared, and the persuasive arguments they presented.

Abbigayle Hunter not only possessed an impressive understanding of the law but also had excellent negotiation skills. Her tirelessly advocated on our behalf, ensuring that our interests were protected and our rights were upheld. Their ability to navigate complex legal matters and maneuver through any obstacles that arose was truly remarkable.
Stephanie and her team were AMAZING! I found her through a mutual friend and she handled my case with care and compassion. Even her team checked on me, answered all my questions I had, overall she made sure everything was token care of during the ENTIRE process! When she told me “don’t you worry, that’s my job” I truly believe her and in the end she got the results that I am so grateful for! Hopefully I won’t have to go through the process again but if I have to she will most definitely be the woman I WILL call on! Thank you so much Stephanie and Danielle you both made this process a lot less stressful with your knowledge and compassion towards me and my case!!!
Steph and her team worked diligently to ensure all evidence or lack there of was thoroughly examined. Her knowledge and experience within the military justice system gave me piece of mind throughout the process as she was well versed in the way everything played out. My family and I are grateful for the hard work and professionalism displayed by everyone on her team. Thank you!
Steph was the first and clear choice to handle my ADSEP board. I was facing serious allegations, which she handled with professionalism while keeping me posted along the way. Her expertise in UCMJ matters is second to none. Without her I would have probably lost my retirement benefits.
Stephanie is very experienced and a great attorney.
There are many things that I could say about this particular law firm, but instead of going into the weeds on my particular case, I feel as though brevity would be the best choice here. I was primarily represented by Ms. Abbigayle Hunter, and in short, I believe the representation by Ms. Hunter was above reproach. I couldn’t have asked for a better legal professional to handle the complexities of my particular case. She was transparent, punctual, and actually made me feel as though she was personally invested, despite the fact that she had already been paid for representation. She didn’t sugarcoat hard truths and was very up front about all different aspects relating to my case. It was comforting in a way that she was also a fellow service member, and it made me feel as though she took this case to heart and it added another level of drive to the case. Ms. Hunter has a certain tenacity in the courtroom that I found very refreshing to witness, and I would strongly recommend her to anyone else seeking legal advice. Would actively seek to be represented by her again, though also hoping it’s never needed.
Outstanding!!!! She's very smart, knows her job, and communicates with you all the time with the best of her knowledge. I highly recommend Kral Military Defense!!!
After my command refused to give me due process, I was lost for words and truly had no where to turn. A shipmate referred me to Steph and it was the best possible recommendation I have ever received. Reliable, expert, professional and overall just a great person. She never lost sight of my case and would check in on me to ensure I was doing good personally. I highly recommend her services to anyone who may have a legal issue. At minimum, request a consultation. I can assure that you will not be dissatisfied!
Great team! After hiring this legal team i was pleased with their work and their ability to go above and beyond resulting in a finding of not guilty.
js_loader

About The Firm


Kral Military Defense defends members of America's military throughout the world. We do not maintain physical office space in the traditional sense. Instead, we offer secure video and telephone consultations and meet with current clients, as needed, at home and abroad.

KMD practices in Washington D.C. under D.C. App. R. 49, limiting the practice only to federal military courts in which we are admitted to practice providing services authorized under Rule 49(c)(3). No attorney is admitted to the Washington D.C. Bar, which is not required for our federal military practice.

Office Location


3111 Camino Del Rio N.
Suite 400
San Diego, CA 92108

The information on this website is for general information purposes only. Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. Nothing on this site should create an expectation of any particular outcome or result. Every case is unique.

Back to Top

©2025 Kral Military Defense | Sitemap

855-707-UCMJ